Jump to content

We're moving to Discord!

Come join in the discussion here!

You can also still find out all the latest news on TWITTER and FACEBOOK

Thank you for your continued support, and we look forward to welcoming you shortly.

The Warcradle Team


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


CDR_G last won the day on January 8 2017

CDR_G had the most liked content!

About CDR_G

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
  • Interests

Contact Methods

  • Yahoo

Recent Profile Visitors

3,851 profile views
  1. Good questions. I need to know if my old models will all be second class citizens. I am all for coining the DW/DA story and trying out the new rules. But not starting over. The existing models will need to be just as good as the new models to maintain my enthusiasm.
  2. Prussian mediums like the Hussars are worth their cost. I have the Gustav, Brandtaucher and Lahn models- hard to ignore those in any game I use Prussians. The Gustav is a terrific model- A rail gun loaded on a armed transport. Great detail and Really nice to have in a fleet. The elbe is similar to me and and great carrier. The new BBs are cool as well. I will be interested in how the partially distributed Spartan units will be dealt with in 3.0. Will any Spartan era models be produced? Will there be new new versions of those models that will have the same stats but different stylings? A model company must sell models, WC wants to honor the past models and sell new ones. How those will integrate with the old will definitely be a key point in how DA will move forward. WC is highly engaged with the community- they must like to do that because "Patience of Job " and ad nauseam come to mind when reading all the FB and community posts, especially on fluff. I hope they can get more details on these questions. They may have to some degree- there is a LOT of posts by them so I might have missed it.
  3. Starting a new DW phase of life. Anxious to see the new stuff

    1. RuleBritannia


      Alex Mann's blog has some detailed renders and models.  Very detailed.

  4. Looking at the box art for the second edition boxes and bothering to look it up in the new rules, yeah have to. Kinda a waste of space though. Some really needd it just like the aerial units but others, meh. No biggy I guess. Thanks for the responses.
  5. My email is cdr_g@icloud.com

    Mike Gallagher

  6. I need to get you more feedback. Please send me the drafts
  7. There is a Dystopian Wars Virginia (DWVA) group on the Man Battle Stations Forum.
  8. Sure. I play a game at Huzzah Hobbies (Asburn) once a month, I play at Eagle & Empire in Arlington, and at a friends home in Woodbridge so when I say Northern Virginia it pretty much is Northern Virginia. Campaigners can play within their own group as desired but I will try to get mixed play if I can.
  9. I just got some land units for a campaign. Do they need the bases that come with them? I thought I saw something about that being changed. I am hoping no, so much extra room and not needed that I can tell.
  10. I just got some land units for a campaign. Do they need the bases that come with them? I thought I saw something about that being changed. I am hoping no, so much extra room and not needed that I can tell.
  11. So getting those arms to stay in place. What have others done? I am afraid I will have to use a pin. That will not be fun.
  12. Gonna try a campaign to facilitate playing interest and scenario playing. DW players in Fredericksburg, VA. have expressed an interest in a campaign. We play at Your Hobby Place game Store. Play at other sites can be included if players wish. The main point is an excuse to play DW games with a mix of scenarios and pick up games. Not a Flashpoint campaign. Preset objectives and no economics. Map is optional depending on the majority of players desires. It will still be a ladder series of scenarios gaining logistical and military capability as one progresses. Players will be able to fight Non-player Fleets for initial objectives and then each other- reducing another player's effective logistics, force size, and make-up. Ladder Scenarios will usually contain a smaller and larger point size versions. Losses of models with SV will not be available for the next battle. Retreat will be permitted for players to maintain their fleet. Players can rotate a few units into and out of their overall fleet between battles. As logistics/force limits increase Players can add units to the overall fleet. Land battles will be allowed. These can be integrated into Capture Scenarios, (capture port, airfield, strait) on an optional basis. Players with small DW fleets can use loaner fleets from me or others as available or form alliances with other players. I will be offering some set piece battles for new players using loaner fleets with pre-identified fleets that will let them progress in the campaign. Like those in the two player sets. These will be smaller scenarios in point size. I can GM some these and other vets could volunteer to do the same if desired. I will design some multi-player scenarios. Input on these will be sought. Players will identify a starting overall fleet that they can then choose from to play specific scenarios. There will be limits on overall points and models selection, (e.g. no Dreads, one Carrier at start, no Local Air at start, and possibly limited to smaller point size battles at start). There will be some small rewards for meeting certain conditions in Ladder Scenarios-very specific and limited use of some prized models, some special tech that can be used until lost, etc. Fairly lose overall. Any pick-up battle can count. AARs will be posted on Man Battle Stations forum with links to images as available. I will post links from DW FB sites to MBS as well (with Andy's OK). Their will be a ending date and prizes--TBD I will post more with initial scenarios later this week.
  13. It varies across Powers, which have different technological strengths. I don't know of a specific RADAR yet, but since they have Target Painters, there is some form of radio based signal generation and detection. Radio is mentioned in the TAC cards I believe. All is possible in this world if the game needs it. As well as some "blind spots" of missing technology we might expect them to have. One can assume that some of the trickiest tech is only in military channels. They are way ahead in basic understanding of electricity and wave theory than history. Historically the existence of radio waves and wave propagation was not known (except, perhaps by a few leading edge dudes) until the very late 19th and early twentieth century. Meanwhile they seem to use steam mechanics for many things and metallurgy is mixed, with lots of brass. The proliferation of technology and displacement of older tech, which works just fine for most purposes can be a reason to describe the mix of what we would see as an odd use of inferior materials. Besides its an excuse to have cool looking things. Like ships that are larger than a cruiser can move in one turn. A strength of DW is the very short weapons ranges. Accomplished by messing with turn time length and just making it fun.
  14. Meh. Not buying the 9 Carrier points make it better. More resources makes you less capable on a unit by unit basis? It seems arbitrary. You are still making 4xSAS. Which REALLY hurt with Bombers. Big, Big impact. The Fleet carrier should have a 5xSaw SAS and a 4xSaw SAS, at least the expensive ones. I would gladly trade a carrier point for that. It is another change like carriers not being able to provide their own SAS, that smells of play balance manipulation via an easy out, but makes no sense. Arbitrary. I guess the vision of cycling lots of SAS was part of the idea. Not sure what happened in the testing but in a three turn game that is is not a big part. With starting distances closer, upping the destruction and shortening the games, it is unlikely to be a big factor. It isn't in almost all of my games, which include players from a 75 to 100 mile range , covering different club styles. Especially with the tactic of leaving 1 or two bomber SAWs intact. The "choice" they are making you take seems wrong. I have no issue with the single 5xSAS with the Assault Carriers and most Super Forts. But the fleet carriers that stay back, build crappy, yes crappy, attack SAS will seem wrong. If it had been 5xSAS and a 4XSAS for big carriers no one would have blinked an eye.
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.