kimek

I also think that new Pinpoint MAR are plain bad. How about make it automatically decrease enemy's DR by X value? For example: squad of Sor'Ka, who have Pinpoint value of 2, fire against Kratos. His usual DR of 8/8/6 reduced to 6/6/4 because of pinpoint.

Nation: RC Model: Belgorod Landship Problem: A LOT! Pathetic speed, medicore toughness, less than desirable firepower. Solution: Increase the speed by 2", Increase the firepowerf of Broadsides, Fore Guns and Turret by 1 AD on each avaliable RB Nation: RC Model: Orlov Heavy Tank Problem: Just like Belgorod he just too slow to leave long enough, overprised, too vulnerable for boarding Solution: Increase the speed by 2", Increase the AP and HP value by 2 Nation: RC Model: Poltava Light Tank Problem: It's firepower AND overall resistance are inferior to that of Tikhvin and they are cost MORE! Solution: Decrease the size of squad from 2-4 to 2-3. but change the Turret from Primary (P) to Seconadary (S), thus alloving it to be linked with Fore Guns

I also feel that RC deserve Close-Quarter Gunnery MAr on their Primary Weapons SO very much. Extra HP also wouldn't hurt... for the overall slow movement.

After the fiasco with terran Assault helix I really wish for hawkers to use good ol tank on threads.

Sorry, my mistake - I mixed the name of our Infantry and our scout bikes, since I grown too accustomized with calling them simply bikes.

Just as you asked Nicius, I tend to use Mul'Kats as a mobile defenders for our Tank Destriyers and our Heavy Tank from the pesky srop units. Use a scout move to move them near the closest drop marker and put them into Overwatch.

Best of luck to you and your warriors of Kerender!

Good choice - all things listed by you ignores cloack (and hurts a lot even with medicorly good roll of dices)

I think I prefer the second list. While I prefer Ka'Kuns over Kul'Voks because of their speed, our Heavy Infantry are more resilent, due to their DR 6. I think having more units with Pin-Point are better, coz' you'll get a chance to strip second HP from the Relthoza's walkers, even with their annoying Cloacks, so w squads of Ja'Gors are welcome.

Maybe you're better to keep Bor'Kas near your long range attack units as a guardian against drop - their scatter cannons would ruin any infantry's day

Dice rolls can be pretty insane I agree. But I doubt thwt we can blame the model itself for this

I wanted to clarify - if fortifications ALWAYS starts in Advance Deployment do they count in the maximun advance limit of 40% of entire fleet point cost?

I can't find Windsor in KOB ORBAT anymore

I dunno, on the land we have a plenty of mean units, comparing to the other nations. Terriers are super-mean smalls (4 AD on the RB 2 for the win!), MK 2 still very solid (though, IMHO their AD-ordnance value should go up by 1), Steward my faorites - just give me inot of 3 and even Zhan and Vauban would sweat a bullets meeting them. Brunel and Soverign... just pure win IMHO (I hope thei turn limit would be fixed in the next update)!! On the sea-side... well, Id say we really need a tools to deal with large-heavy lists. Damn, I'm still sore remembering RC's list with 2 Khatangas, Kostroma and ally!Enyerprise.

15-16 AD should do the trick, since the opponent hit on 3+. And honestly, outside Windsor what good unit we had in our Navy&

I'm against it - this rule would be too much of a nerf, since the difference betwwen hit on 4+ and 3+ is a HUGE. If we go by such logic, then all naval dreds, Vauban and Zhandamao also should have such rule due to their immensive size (the latter two a flying carriers for God sake).

I don't think that Windsor need a fix. You can roll awesomely and you can roll badly for the template attack and each target require it's own roll. The immunity to torpedoes and rockets are balance for the +1 to hit against it. And honestly, our dreadnought fortification need to be good to help weaker British fleet. P.S. With just 4 AA bombers are scourge of the poor thing.

After playing against both Madam AND Vauban I firmly concluded that even if Vauban got nerfed he STILL would be better choice than Madam. Being hit on 5+ and 4+ are HUGE dufference and Vauban still give you 2 extra activation and SAS support, while being 100 pts cheaper!!

Yeah, Svarog are really awesome for his point-cost (as a british player I really love my Windsor, but Svarog really a beast - DR/CR of 11/15 with Ablative Armor - OMFG!!). Windsor have a better overall gunnery and the better firing arcs (and also immune to the Rockets and Torpedoes), but Svarog are harder to hit, have a much better resistance toward the attack froms the SAS and even with 1-2 HP left can be a utter monster in CQB, where he can cleave a slightly damaged dreadnought in half in one go!

It did well in my game against my russian buddy, but his large-heavy fleet simply pummeled rest of my army. It was a 1800 game and 2 Khatangas, Enterprise (ally) and Kostrome + 2 Kirchevs were a bit too much for torpedo-heavy fleet.

I think that instead of tribals, pair of Kirchevs would be far more nastry to take on your opponent's Tribals, as they complitelly immune to torpedoes.

I think many Kurak Alliance players agree that Terrans' Assault Helix needs a major improvement!

IMHO, Olovs are hideoucly bad - slow, expensive and have only 4 HP. yes, their RB 1-2 firepower are awesome, but their miniscul speed made it impossible to reach their optimum range unharmed/alive. Poltavas are even worse... just bring their old (s) turrets back, please, SG!

Beacuse one of the biggest advantages of the CQB it's a complete ignore of ALL defensive rules. So let's keep it like that - once you in CQB forget about all Hard targets, Cloaks and Shields!

Honeslty - it's would be a hideoucly bad solution! CQB rules states clearly that NO defensive MAR or generators can work in close-quarter battle and it MUST be keep like that! Simply improvig Lokis and Hodrs gunnery would make them much more pleasant to the Terran players IMHO